User:MathiIde/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Women Strike for Peace

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article from a list of past Wiki articles provided by my professor. I turned to this one in particular because I am particularly interested in women's history -- especially when it comes to protest.

Evaluate the article
Lead section: The lead does inclue an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead also provides the reader a brief description of the major events surrounding the Women Strike for Peace movement. Yet, the lead might be overly detailed and some information could be provided in the subsections.

Content: The article's content is relevant to the topic and is up-to-date, though it could benefit from even more information and content. The content does address topics related to historically underrepresented populations as it deals with a Women's activist group in the 1960s. Yet, the content could maybe use some rewriting as certain sentences can appear ambiguous or not clear enough, especially towards the end of the article.

Tone and Balance: The article is pretty neutral and the writers did not add any personal commentary on the topic. The different sections and subsections are rather equal and viewpoints seem to be accurately described.

Sources and references: All the references in the article appear to be reliable sources of informations. However, the article could definitely use more sources. The article is quite heavy and it appears to lack some more references to reflect better the situation at hand.