User:MathisBitton/The Public and its Problems/Diegosalazarguerra Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MathisBitton


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MathisBitton/sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The Public and its Problems

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hey, Mathis! I want to congratulate you for such a great written and interesting article! This is the first time ever I hear about this book, and after reading your article I feel that I understand what the book is about and John Dewey's purpose. The truth is that there are not that many things that I can comment or "criticize" (positively) about your article.

Lead:


 * Great introduction.
 * Very easy to read and understand.
 * Contains the general information.
 * Gives you a sense of what the book is about.

Content:


 * Very rich content.
 * It's great that you add a summary divided by the different "parts" of the book.
 * At first, I was about to suggest that you add a "critiques" section, but I think that you discussed some counterpoints (implicitly) in the Background and in the Reception and Influence sections.

Tone and balance:


 * Neutral tone.
 * Objective.
 * The article shows arguments in favor and against the book's ideas.

Sources and References:


 * Reliable and analytical sources.
 * I had access to the links that I clicked on.

Organization:


 * I didn't found any grammatical mistake (keep in mind that english is my second language and that I am certainly not be the best identifying grammatical mistakes haha).
 * The structure seems to follow a logical and natural order for any reader to understand what the book is about.