User:MathisT13/Swallet/Nathanielbarrett Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MathisT13, Rebe.sala


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Sinkhole


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sinkhole

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Overall this is a great article. It is comprised of many different sections and has a plethora of photos to go along with it. Although, with this comes the abundance of information and examples on the lower half of the contents. I believe that this could be reduced down to at least 3 to 4 example. Although, since the page is so big, I really cannot tell what you all have done, or not done. But overall thats what I would do. Likewise, I do not see any infraction on plagiarism or copyright material. Once again a suggest would be to cut down maybe a section or two. I would leave this to you all, but I feel as though the page could be cut down a bit to help with flow and concentration of information. This page was very strong on the intro as well as relevant information but lacked in conciseness in my personal opinion. Although, the article seemed neutral to me which was great as well. Overall, great page and very well done.