User:Matierallygirly/D Smith/Dublin1501 Peer Review

The lead provides a good overview of D. Smith's career, accomplishments, and background. Your introductory sentence concisely introduces the article's topic and it includes a good brief description of the article's major sections. It contains some information that might be better placed in the body. Maybe summarize this part to make it more concise.

The content you added is relevant to the topic, providing a wide view of D. Smith's life and career. The details you included about her early life, music career, reality TV appearances, and her debut documentary is informative. But some information could be more concise, and the content about her appearance on Love & Hip Hop Atlanta is very detailed. Maybe summarize this section while keeping the essential information.

Your content is neutral and unbiased, and it doesn’t seem to show any opinion. But make sure that the information about her experiences on reality TV shows stays objective and neutral.

You have done a good job with referencing, but it seems as though you’re missing sources from the lead paragraph. Make sure you add those in to make sure your article is referenced properly.

Your content is well organized into sections, which reflect the major points of the filmmaker. But as I mentioned earlier, some sections, especially the one regarding her time on Love & Hip Hop Atlanta, could be more concise and focused. You have used proper headings and subheadings have been used to separate different parts of her life and career, making the content clear and easy to read.

Overall, the content you added has made a good quality article. Your depth and detailed information about D. Smith's life and career makes it a strong article. To make the article better, maybe you could make the career section more concise and make sure that all information is properly cited in the lead paragraph. Great work!

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)