User:Matpeng/sandbox

Aya of Yop City
Overall, I don't think that bias is the main issue with this article. It lacks a lot or references and mostly resembles a High School paper that would require the student to summarize the plot and the characters. The focus on the plot really distracts from the reception of this series of books and of the context it was published in. I don't understand why the author(s) of the article used only a few references but added numerous external links. I think that the bottom part of the article is very messy. A few external links are marked as "dead links".

The "talk" section about this article is really short and talks mostly about dead links. There is also a Template at the beginning of the article that highlights the lack of references. These elements make me think that this article has been written by only a few people (maybe only one) and that the only changes people made were incremental (adding or checking a few references here and there, not much changed in the content).

The article is part of a Project called Wiki Project Comics and also part of a course assignment (ours !).

The French version of the article is also very developed when it comes to the content of the books and the number of references is not much bigger. That being said, they seem more relevant as they are cited in all the "important" parts of the articles (the reception, the lead, the context...). The lead is also better on the French version of the article. It is shorter but it mentions only what is really needed.

Catherine L. Besteman
This article is much shorter but the number of citations is impressive. When we focus on the number of references it can even be quite distracting as the references are cutting sentences and paragraphs right in the middle. The sentence are very neutral and straight-forward, I think this is a good article although it is very short. It could easily be improved I think by adding a section about how her work was received or even about her own engagement, outside of her work.

The talk section is as short as the previous article. I noticed that both articles' "Talk" section have only been modified by a Bot which added external links. The article is also part of several groups or WikiProject apparentlyat'sa wikiprjectreally.

I think that this article might lack a Template/grid on the upper right corner, where Besteman's picture and main works could be added.

Bibliography/References/Citations
Added a reference for a sentence on The Doors page that needed a citation (I used Citation Hunt).