User:MattAnthStudent/Human–animal communication/NotArmandoG Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MattAnthStudent


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MattAnthStudent/Human–animal communication/Bibliography
 * User:MattAnthStudent/Human–animal communication


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Human–animal communication

Evaluate the drafted changes
Your additions do a great job in describing the Origins of Communication with Canines because it bridges a gap that isn't in the Human-animal communication article already. Before, it just showed the communication among dogs and humans. Now, it shows where this communication possibly originated from which you did a great job of showing. If I didn't know this was a peer review, I would've already thought this was taken straight from Wikipedia. You did a great job adding in hyperlinks which could lead down a rabbit hole to other topics and allowing it to become more discoverable. You did a great job remaining neutral and including sources. You did a great job breaking it down into multiple paragraphs when the content didn't benefit each other. Your content improved the overall quality of the article as a whole because as I previously mentioned, you bridged the need of people wanting to know the origin(s) of communication with canines.

The one thing I'd do is fixing your citation placement because some come before commas or periods and you want the citation to be placed after the comma/period/etc. I was unable to find this source: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-taming-of-the-cat-2009-06/ so maybe try updating this source or finding it on a different website? Your bibliography didn't have anything but you have sources so I'm not sure if this part matters, I'd just keep all my sources there if I were you so you don't have to copy/paste from elsewhere but that's personal preference! The rest of your sources were good as they were well written scientific articles.