User:Mattalee/Water, energy and food security nexus/Cmoliva14 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mattalee


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mattalee/Water, energy and food security nexus


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Water, energy and food security nexus

Lead

 * Missing some sections on the articles main sections but shows that it has been updated from original article.

Content

 * Your in your beginning stages but could really see how what you will be covering contributes to another aspect of the original articles, does not seem like an out of place idea
 * Some questions I did have was if you were going to analyze the complexities a little more specifically such as naming examples or go the other route and explain ways to achieve proper data collection for more accurate analysis?

Tone and Balance

 * Neutral tone, does not give off any bias.
 * The section you are adding is straightforward.

Organization

 * can clearly see what was originally from article and what you are additionally adding to the article.

Sources and References

 * Really interesting sources that will tie well with the section you are writing on!
 * All peer reviewed sources.