User:MatthieuFoucu/Nuclear weapon/TheEditor0702 Peer Review

General info
Matthieu Foucu
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MatthieuFoucu/Nuclear weapon
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nuclear weapon

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

This part does not have to be evaluated because the content that the user updated is relatively minor, and does not change the overall structure or topic of the article.

Content

The content added is quite useful. Matthieu adds the Damascus incident, which although seems useless in the grand scheme of things, it highlights the mechanism of action for nuclear warheads. A central addition of Matthieu's is discussing the non violent applications of nuclear bombs. I believe this was a highly informative addition because we often correlate a negative connotation with the term nuclear. By including non violent uses, such as that for construction, it creates a more nuanced view of nuclear use. Furthermore, by discussing policy regarding limiting nuclear use in construction, it shows that not all nuclear policy is geared towards wartime use.

Tone and Balance

The content added is neutral. In no way does it persuade the reader in favor of one thing over the other. The information could possibly be used to show why nuclear weaponry should bee more commonly used, but that is up to interpretation of the reader.

Sources and References

All the claims presented are backed up by relevant information. The only issue is that it is not cited in proper format, but the links are provided. All links when clicked on are from reputable sources, including .edu websites and .gov sites.

Organization

Organization could be improved upon. For example, the information regarding the Damascus incident seems somewhat misplaced, but is nonetheless useful.

Overall Impressions

Overall the information added is important, and even essential to making the topic more complete.