User:Mattisse/GA template

GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I'm happy to say that this article meets the Good Article criteria: it provides good coverage, is neutral and well-referenced, clearly-written, complies with the parts of WP:MOS required for a  GA and uses appropriate images that have good captions and comply with WP's policies on images.
 * per MOS:LINK
 * per MOS:SYL
 * per Red
 * Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)
 * Per MOS:LINK
 * WP:PSTS - no OR

Checking against GA criteria
This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. .
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * 5 dead links found using this tool. Note AOL, ebay and possibly pitchfork are not RS. Many paragraphs are completely unreferenced.
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * REf #24, #25 are blogs, #15 is a SPS site, as noted above the aol, ebay and pitchfork sites are not RS
 * c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * tagged with rationales
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * captioned
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold whilst referencing is sorted.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * tagged with rationales
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * captioned
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold whilst referencing is sorted.
 * On hold whilst referencing is sorted.

alternative

 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * Not Yet
 * 1) The lead should be expanded to summarize the entire article, including the backgroung and design sections.
 * 2) "She was the lead ship of her class; her sister ship was Moreno." -This doesn't seem as important as the dates of the ships construction, etc. It should be moved down in the lead.
 * 3) Something is wrong with one of the templates in the infobox.
 * 4) Why didn't the ship see service in World War II? Briefly discuss the politics of Argentina's nnuetrality during the war.
 * 5) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * Not Yet
 * 1) "saw no active service". -Needs a ref.
 * 2) "virtually the end of her active career" -needs a specific page number for a ref.
 * 3) The further reading material should be in templates.
 * 4) It is broad in its coverage:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) Overall:
 * On Hold until a few minor issues are resolved. For the most part, the article looks very well done!