User:Mattydubsonly2004/Nutrition/Saifk72 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(mattydubsonly2004)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Nutrition


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is short and concise. I was able to get a full understanding of the topic and it isn't overly explained. I can see the different sections in the article. Your lead does not include information that is not present in the article. It isn't overly detailed and introduces the topic well. The content added isn't random and relates to the topic. It offers a wider perspective on the topic. The content added is up to date. However, the topic in this article does not deal with one of wikipedia's equity gaps. The content added is neutral and not opinionated. The viewpoints are neither over or under represented. I feel like the article covers them all equally. The content added is neutral and doesn't try to persuade the reader one way. The information is backed up by reliable sources. There are a multitude of authors. However, there are no historically marginalized individuals. The sources are thorough and informative. They are current and the links for these sources do work. The content is pretty easy to read and well organized. There aren't any grammatical issues and it is clear and concise. The organization makes sense for the topic, it includes the different viewpoints and subjects within the topic.