User:Matyfaye/sandbox

Article Review
As strange and creepy bloodletting might be, I find it to be an interesting part of our history. I would like Wikipedia’s information to be up to date about bloodletting. I visited the bloodletting page on Wikipedia, and found three aspects of it worth commenting on: its lack in citations, age of the article, and neutral given information

Age of the article
By looking at the edit history and the citations that are provided, makes the article seem up to date as it can be presently. Many users who visit the page appear to keep making updates each month to the article. The majority of the cited articles are ranged in age from 2000-2018.

Voice of the article
The page gives a neutral voice without being biased. I couldn’t find any opinionated details about bloodletting or relation to bloodletting. The information being stated on this page was very straight to the point and never went off topic.

Summary
Overall, I would say this page is moderate. The article seems to be very well straight to the point and never derailed off topic, giving plenty of information about bloodletting in the past to how it correlates to medicine in today’s world. Even though it gave well-put information about its topic, the page doesn’t seem to be very well cited. In the middle of the article there’s a lot that is said with little amount of citations. However, with the potential of amount of citations the page could have, the given citations seem to be reliable and up to date.

(side note: As a part of this assignment, I also added a citation where it was requested - added citation #20 here.)