User:Max41022/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
October–November 2021 Sudanese coup d'état

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Was on Wikipedia's list of c-level articles so needs editing/updating, important because a contemporary political development in Sudan, article could definitely use some work in quality of sources, lead section, and overall grammar/clarity.

(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
Lead Section: No good intro sentence, overly detailed at times, no outline of sections to follow

Content: Section headers are a little wordy and could be more concise, content needs more detail in several areas, little from view of Sudanese

Tone: Slightly biased against the coup, much more information on killing on civilians and resistance to the coup than elsewhere

Sources: some links don't work, all english language sources, almost all newspaper articles

Organization: grammar is technically correct but awkward at times, section organization is a bit scattered

Images: Only two images in the article, one is a portrait, needs more images of the actual coup or perhaps Sudanese military and protesters

Talk page: discussion around images in article (lack thereof) and moving the article's category classification

Overall: On the whole a fine page, but could certainly use improvements, particularly in including more local sources to make it a more balanced page that incorporates reporting from Sudan and a non-Western perspective, organization could also be improved for the sake of clarity.

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)