User:MaxCohen01/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Visual communication

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I found it very interesting from the title of it. I also chose it because visual communication is. something I would like to learn more of for the future.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section: I believe the lead section gives a good backstory quickly about visual communication, I also think that the article concisely and clearly describes what visual communications is without giving too much info in the first paragraph. There is also a brief description of the very few major points and is put together very concisely.

Content: The content is up to date including links that include articles that were published the year of 2022. All content in the article is content that should be there for ones educational use.

Tone and Balance: the article is extremely neutral without any personal pronouns involving I and Me or my. The viewpoints are not over referenced and not under-referenced they are in the middle and just right without the author choosing one side over the other.

Sources and references: The sources or embedded links are up to date. Each fact involving the historic perspective is correct in the dates of history.

Organization and writing quality: I didn't have a hard time reading the article, there were no spelling errors from when I read it. The article gives a clear description of visual communication references without going off topic.

Images and Media: he article includes interesting images that help go with the explanation. One of those examples involves a diagram of visual communication process. The images are very well captioned because they are short and sweet but descriptive.

Talk Page discussions: They talk about if there are certain punctuations missing, or if citations are missing. The article is part of the Wiki Project graphic design, wiki project media, and wiki projects systems.

Overall impression: The overall articles status is rated a A-. I believe the article had many strengths involving a very descriptive way of describing visual communication. I think what could of been improved was the possibility of adding more photos or visual examples to the article. This article is very well-developed I would suggest many people to read this article.