User:MaxD02/sandbox

Evaluating an Article Questions
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?


 * Everything is relevant to the article, nothing distracting.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?


 * There is no content that appears to be heavily biased towards a particular position.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * There is only one source with a link, but that link does lead to the online version of the book that is accessible to everyone.
 * Lavoisier, Laplace, and Hess' involvement with specific heat and latent heat has no citation and explanation into what contributions were made.

Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Wikipedia Project Sources:

Wikipedia Project Sources:

 * A Brief History of Early Silica Glass: Impact on Science and Society (2019)


 * The “Wonderful Properties of Glass”: Liebig's Kaliapparat and the Practice of Chemistry in Glass (2015)


 * The Visual Image of Chemistry: Perspectives from the History of Art and Science (2007)


 * From Topos to Oikos: The Standardization of Glass Containers as Epistemic Boundaries in Modern Laboratory Research (1850-1900)

Add to an Article
Add a sentence or two to an article with a citation (insert here).