User:Max harding/Laminella sanguinea/Jazellel Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?    Max Harding
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Max harding/Laminella sanguinea
 * Link to the current version of the article:
 * Laminella sanguinea
 * Laminella sanguinea

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * Yes! I am very impressed with the amount of information you were able to share, and go further into detail about. For example, mentioning Laminella sanguinea ' predators. It was hard for me to uncover information about my assigned mollusk, I'm glad you seem to have an idea which direction you want to go.
 * Check the main points of the article:
 * In your sandbox the binomial nomenclature is italicized, but I can see that it is in the Laminella sanguinea Wikipedia article itself. So good job!
 * Definitely need to add and organize some information with headings. Yes, I will work on that thank you.
 * Check the sources:
 * Your sources look good, just need more about the snail itself. Yup.
 * Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * Since its difficult to find information about endemic mollusk' I sympathize with you, but there needs to be more information.. About its habitat/distribution, conservation, human use, and cultural significance. Yes, just getting more information overall is a good goal for me.
 * Organize your article with subheading. And add more sources :)
 * What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * Add a couple more points of information:) Thank you for the input.