User:Maxack37/Social media and political communication in the United States/Brusso7 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing:Maxack37
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Maxack37/sandbox

Lead evaluation
The addition to the lead was concise and well written. It clearly explained the additions you had to the article. It also helps by giving background info on the topics that will be discussed in the article. The major sections are clearly highlighted in the lead which is good. I think your lead is a perfect size as it really halps readers understand the information that will be presented.

Content evaluation
The additional content is definitely quite relevant. By mentioning the most recent presidential election, you add reliability to your work. The content added all seems relevant to your over arching subject and the additional info really helps the reader understand the topic. I don't believe any content is missing and it is definitely up to date.

Tone and balance evaluation
The content is definitely neutral. This comes from your ability to present the information in a balanced way. By presenting both sides of every argument, you are able to provide the reader with the tools to make a decision rather than making the decision for them. I did not observe any biases while reading your additions to the article and found you to never try and persuade the reader.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
Based on your bibliography I could see the works chosen are quite new. The articles and books chosen to gain information from are also quite credible as the information comes from reliable sources. Currently your sources are not linked so make sure to do that so you can cite them throughout the article.

Organization evaluation
The content is clear and serves a purpose in the article. I did not find the information added too much as I believe you found a great balance in additions to the article. The sections flow well in ordinance with the paragraphs written by the previous authors of the page. Grammar and spelling was good.

Images and media evaluation
No images used.

Overall evaluation
I think that you have a great start here on the topic. I believe you can be a bit more thorough on the information presented as it feels a bit skimpy. The Scandals section could definitely have more information with a specific case potentially. The ability to flow with the work of previous authors was a definite strength but I think strengthened vocabulary will enhance your work.

-Bradley Russo