User:Maxim Lavrenko/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cyclic group

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because I am currently studying group theory, and I'd like to know more about cyclic groups.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The leading statement is concise and to the point. It introduces the notion of a cyclic group in group theory, and provides a brief definition. It also includes relevant information, described later in the article, like the notion of every cyclic group of prime order being simple, and the consequence that every abelian group is a direct product of cyclic groups. It also doesn't include any irrelevant information.

Since this is an article about a concept in mathematics, it is easy to see that there is no irrelevant information, and there are no gaps about the way the topic is presented.

Again, since this is a math topic, it is unbiased, as it simply talks about a notion of a cyclic group in group theory and the way it fits with other topics in group theory.

The contents of the article are properly cited, as seen by the number of links in the article leading to textbooks.

The images in the article present examples of cyclic groups, which may be helpful for people that understand things better visually.

As seen by the talk page and the edit history, the article has not been edited in a long time, but that's ot be expected, as it is a math topic, so the research is moving slowly.

Overall, this is a good article, as it is clear for beginners and professionals, and there is no unnecessary information.