User:Maxlynsw/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Civic amenity site
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes. It is also very well written
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * No. This is very important as there are quite a few explanatory phrases and pieces of info that are not cited
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes but they need to be diversified. There are only two
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Yes actually! On the environment
 * Yes actually! On the environment

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Lucille Whipper


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes but its not much to go off of.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * No.. This is really important as the first line needs it.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Eh. They are mainly retroactive ad focusing on her being honored.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Yes! She is an URM (under represented minority)

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Kenneth Benjamin (judge)


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes. There are no value adjectives prescribed to him or his work.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes. Article is well cited
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Yes! He is not only a URM, but most of Guyanas articles are start or stub class.

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Peacemakers
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes but its quite a bit bulky. I think if its absolutely necessary to include, its members should be listed elsewhere beyond the lead
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Seems to be
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * NO! Should be flagged because there are un- cited quotes.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Uncertain. They are limited however.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Maybe. Its quite cool actually as it is addressing a pacifist advocacy org.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.