User:Maxmoss11/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Masters Education

When looking over the article, there were a few things that stood out as irrelevant to the article topic. Firstly, a lot of the examples are very good if we are viewing the article from an United States of America perspective, but the problem that should be assessed is looking into what a masters education is in foreign countries, where the process of attaining a higher education might be different. This is not only information that is out of date, but it is also irrelevant. I was also looking at some of the wikipedia suggested improvements for this article, and one thing that was suggested was to update, and add more citations to this article. This is something that should be fairly easy to do as a Masters Education is a fairly relevant topic, and it interests me personally, as I might try to pursue this. The article was definitely pretty neutral, and it offered a lot of content with many different sections, but this is also a very broad topic. I stated this earlier, but some of the viewpoints that are over represented, are the viewpoints geared towards domestic Masters Education, and lacks the foreign aspect that could be added and also could add to the pages citations which is an area that it lacks. When checking out the links of the citations on this page, its clear to see that this is where this page could definitely work for my project, as most of the categories on the page lack content, but more importantly, there's only one link for citations. The only source leads to a Harvard academic website, but that is pretty much it. This article clearly lacks citations.

'''These are solid reflections. (DB) 5/5'''