User:Maxygangadharan/Cheryl Marie Wade/Chloe McKeown Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Empro23; Promisepitman; Maxygangadharan


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Maxygangadharan/Cheryl Marie Wade
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Initial Thoughts/Overall Impressions
My initial thoughts on your article are as follows:

I think you have a great first draft! Your information is strong and well supported by your resources. I think to improve the article, it would amazing to see images on the your page (possibly of some of the artwork, poetry, etc). I also think it is important to link to other articles when possible. I think this will help make the wiki page more compatible with Wikipedia's mission and will help you exploit all your resources in making this article great! Overall, I really liked all the info you included about Cheryl Marie Wade and I look forward to seeing the final product!

Lead
I don't see a lead that introduces your figure. I recommend you add a sentence or two at the top of your page introducing Cheryl Marie Wade and her role as a notable figure/feminist. A lead will help you introduce your focus and gives a brief statement on the individual and lets readers know why she matters.

Content
I think your content is super relevant! However, I think your subtitle "death" could easily be included under her early life as an ending sentence. I don't think there is enough information for their to warrant its own heading. As for the rest of your subheadings, I found all of them really informative! I think they include pertinent information that is relevant and sound. Consider linking to as many Wiki articles as you can to show readers the various connections.

Tone and Balance
I think the tone of your article is good. It is impartial and remains very "matter-of-fact." The balance of your article is great as well. I did not feel, while I was reading your article. that there was any bias towards a particular "side" or opinion. Great work!

Sources and References
Great use of sources! The links work great and I liked that you used a variety of work to support your biography. I did see a warning on citation number 6 - it says something is missing. I would look back at it and check the citations to ensure they are complete.

Organization
Your organization is well thought out. I think every heading make sense except the death heading (see content comments). I think they have a good flow to them and each one has an organized paragraph to follow. I recommend going through your paragraphs and edit some of the sentences to work better structurally. Try to get rid of run on sentences, and ensure your are using the best wording possible to convey the information. Overall, great job on the organization!

Images and Media
You currently have no media included in your article. If possible, see if you can add images that are relevant to your article to make the page visually appealing and informative.

New Wiki Article Feedback
At the moment, the article is in compliance with Wikipedia's Notability requirements, which say the article must be supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources. Great work! Your article includes clear headings and the content is suited to each of the headings. Definitely work on linking to other articles to make it more discoverable.