User:Maxygangadharan/Cheryl Marie Wade/Julsy2002 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

user Maxygangadharan


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Maxygangadharan/Cheryl Marie Wade

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead of this article is really well done and encompasses a well crafted general overview of Cheryl Marie Wade's life and work. The lead provides a great introduction to what will come in the rest of the article and also includes information that can't be found in the rest of the article like when Wade died and the fact that she was often referred to as the "Queen Mother of Gnarly." The lead is concise but not overly detailed. The content within this article is relevant and well organized. There is no content that is missing or doesn't belong. The content added is neutral and there are no claims that seem to be biased. There are a lot of reliable secondary sources linked and the information in the article is consistent with the information in the secondary sources. The sources included seem incredibly thorough and seem to represent the available information about Wade and her life. I enjoyed the inclusion of information about Rheumatoid Arthritis because it provides important content for the information about Wade's life and work. The content is extremely clear, easy to read, and well written.