User:MayaAbdul/Ocean current/Henne744 Peer Review

General info
MayaAbdul
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:MayaAbdul/Ocean current
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Ocean current

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Maya added a section on ocean currents and climate change which is a very hot topic right now as climates impacts on currents is very important. I think this was a very important section to add and Maya did a good job. The tone throughout the section is neutral and informative and I never felt persuaded to believe something. This is good language use for wikipedia. The lead wasn't updated and I think it could have been because you added an entire section that hadn't been mentioned in the page before. In the sandbox there weren't any in text citation but those are added in the published version which is good because those are very important so that others can look at the information and come to either similar or different conclusions. that being said, I think you summarized the main points well and got the point across.

The content is very relevant to this page. I believe what you added was all very relevant and gave a great overview. I think some of the content is complicated and an example or two of situations around the world could have been helpful for better understanding. The organization of where you put the section also had good flow because there was still the explanation of how the currents worked before it. I think putting it before or after the economics section doesn't really matter as both of them are subsections of the main article so I think where you but your section was really good.