User:MayaHBu/Evaluate an Article

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I wanted to read this article because I am interested in ancient art and sculpture.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article started out with a strong and concise introductory of each of the different things that they were going to talk about. But, then the article does not follow it own plan. the author highlight really interesting things about the architect but does not discuss them of give any more information about them. there is information that should not be there if it not going to be discussed. in terms of content, the article again there is a couple of things missing, and could be improved upon. for the biography, there could have been more information about his family, or his role in his family. the article does aa good job of telling about and linking information about who is in the family and it paints and easy family linage to follow. it neglect to provide information where they found evidence about Hemiunu being the architect for the pyramid of Giza. the article has been edited awhile ago, and has not been looked at since. the sources are realible, but there have been more of them. the acres that they listed were various books, and different authors. the books are semi updated. the links that are listed all work. there were oney 1 image that was listed, and adhere to the wikipedia code. the organization, and the grammar was correct. the tone of the articles was veer neutral and balanced and did not seem to heavily one sided. on the talk page there were s couple of conversation that seem very important to bring up in the original article. such why was Hemiunu believed to the architect of the pyramid of Giza, which is a major missing factor in this article. this article is halfway done in terms of completeness.