User:Maybe possibly/sandbox

Text generated from the Postmodernism Generator located here.

1. Dialectic objectivism and dialectic desublimation
The primary theme of McElwaine’s model of dialectic desublimation is the common ground between sexual identity and reality. But Lacan suggests the use of preconstructive libertarianism to read sexual identity.

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of textual language. Any number of situationisms concerning dialectic desublimation may be found. Therefore, Marx promotes the use of Sartreist existentialism to deconstruct archaic, elitist perceptions of society.

If one examines Batailleist `powerful communication’, one is faced with a choice: either reject dialectic desublimation or conclude that the raison d’etre of the poet is social comment. The subject is contextualised into a Sartreist existentialism that includes truth as a whole. Thus, the main theme of the works of Pynchon is the paradigm, and subsequent fatal flaw, of neodeconstructivist class.

Finnis states that the works of Pynchon are modernistic. It could be said that Debord suggests the use of the capitalist paradigm of discourse to modify and read society.

Sartre uses the term ‘dialectic objectivism’ to denote not theory per se, but subtheory. But if dialectic desublimation holds, we have to choose between Sartreist existentialism and predialectic modernist theory.

Bataille uses the term ‘dialectic desublimation’ to denote the role of the observer as writer. Thus, Sargeant suggests that we have to choose between Sartreist existentialism and postsemantic deappropriation.

The example of Lyotardist narrative depicted in Burroughs’s Junky is also evident in Port of Saints, although in a more textual sense. In a sense, many constructions concerning the bridge between sexual identity and consciousness exist.

2. Expressions of genre
“Society is responsible for hierarchy,” says Debord; however, according to Pickett, it is not so much society that is responsible for hierarchy, but rather the absurdity, and eventually the genre, of society. Foucault uses the term ‘dialectic desublimation’ to denote the role of the poet as participant. It could be said that Lyotard’s critique of precultural dedeconstructivism implies that the State is capable of intention, given that truth is distinct from consciousness.

The subject is interpolated into a Sartreist existentialism that includes truth as a reality. Thus, any number of sublimations concerning dialectic desublimation may be revealed.

In The Last Words of Dutch Schultz, Burroughs deconstructs Debordist situation; in Naked Lunch, however, he denies dialectic desublimation. It could be said that if dialectic theory holds, we have to choose between Sartreist existentialism and posttextual feminism.

The primary theme of Prinn’s model of the precultural paradigm of consensus is the difference between sexuality and sexual identity. Thus, Baudrillard uses the term ‘dialectic objectivism’ to denote the role of the reader as participant.