User:Mbenja/Malika Jeffries-EL/Chemistry Pink Lady Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Mbenja
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Mbenja/Malika Jeffries-EL

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, but I think it could be expanded a little bit by introducing information on each section you chose to write about.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, but the birthday is missing.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No, it does include the a description about the science she researches, but I think you could include more information about each section (maybe a sentence about the most important information from each).
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No. It does a good job of including appropriate information.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise, but like I said before, I think you could expand on it.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes I think that it is. I think you did a good job of finding reliable information for your scientist and still adding relevant content to the article.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I think you could add more information (maybe a sentence or two more) about what type of research or work she did at each institution she worked at or with (or maybe the content of the talks she did/ why she was chosen if there is information about that).

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes. I think that she wrote from an unbiased opinion.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No. I think the information was factual.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No. I think each viewpoint is even.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Two of the resources are not available or not available to Wikidata. I think they can be entered in manually.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes it is.
 * Maggie- I do not think you need to make the Advocacy section a bullet list because there are details in the paragraph that would not flow with a list, to me a bullet list is short sections of information and this section not because each service requires explanation.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, I think so.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media - she did not


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes it is. I think that the content she added helped the article.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? What she has written is concise and detailed. It is information that the article needed.
 * How can the content added be improved? I think that you could add more information about the research that Malika Jeffries-EL did at each institution. You could also add more to the lead so that each section is introduced.