User:Mbid0906/Durham tube

Article body
Content-

The article's content is relevant to the topic, and all seems to be up to date. There is some content that is missing such as, what durham tubes are made of, what the size of durham tubes are, current research that uses Durham tubes in the experiment. I also feel like the history of the Durham tube should be better written.

Tone and Balance

The previous article editor was neutral throughout the article, and did not make any claims that seemed heavily biased.

Sources and References

This article only contains two articles. Although one is a source I would leave in, as it from the researcher who invented the Durham Tube. The other article referenced is a random website and does not seem to be a credible source, therefore should be taken out. There are better sources related to the topic that are more credible than the one provided.

Organization and writing quality

The article is not well written. The way it is laid out is poor, and could use a better structure. The article now seems to be lumped together oddly.

Images and Media

The article does not include any images. I think an image is important in this instance. One picture of the actual tube, and then another picture with the tube being used for its purpose.

Talk page discussion

There is only one comment made on the talk page. The user said that the Japanese version of this page was very useful and have good references that could aid in more detail. It is not in any WikiProjects, however it is in the scope of WikiProject Molecular and Cell Biology. The article is rated as a stub article, meaning it is very short or a rough collection of information that needs work.