User:Mblucas/Tyrone Hayes/Blazer2023 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Mblucas


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mblucas/Tyrone Hayes


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Tyrone Hayes

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Overall the controversies section is very well constructed and flows well. The last sentence that states, " It should be noted that traditionally, reputable scientists are eager to share their data and methods with confidence", can be viewed by a reader as persuasive in thinking that Tyrone Hayes is not confident in his findings.