User:Mblucas/Tyrone Hayes/Mhlooney Peer Review

I think that the Lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. The Lead does seem to include a brief description of the article's major sections. The information present in the Lead is found in the rest of the article, and it is nice and concise. For the references, I don't see why the same reference should be added twice. Aside from that, I think everything is good so far.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)