User:Mbolling20/Boston Massacre Monument/Annabellecrtrt Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mbe2001


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mbe2001/Boston_Massacre_Monument?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Atlantic slave trade

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

Good job describing the monument however introducing the background more might be efficiant. Writing was not over detailed and was new information not given in the original aricle.

Content

Relevant, new information is seen. Content does not appear to be missing anything.

Tone and Balance

Writers thoughts are easy to understand even without reading the actual article. Thoughts also seem to be complete and stay on a nurtural based topic.

Writer allows room for trust by not forcing a side on readers.

Sources and References

Sources work and are reliable. Information is current and described well.

Organization

Content is well organized and put to where we can understand it. Thoughts are free on errors such as grammar and spelling.

Images

Not choosen to be used.

Overall Impression

I loved how you introduced your information you felt needed to be addded, and allowed it to flow in a way that made sense. Your information was straight to the point and allowed room for understanding. As mentioned before, describe the background of your article a little more throughly.