User:Mbonney98/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Kinsey scale
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * This is an interesting topic that I was not aware of previously.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Yes

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Yes, the last update was last updates September 26, 2019
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, the author even includes other scales that were created in later years and included their results.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, the author clearly explains the Kinsey scale and its findings.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, the article begins with history and moves on to the study and findings, and concludes with later developments. It seems to be in a chronological order.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes, the inclusion of an image of the scale helps readers understand the scale.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * The second image is not captioned.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * No, the second image should be captioned.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes, they are included when a visual is needed to understand the scale.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * Conversations are trying to add research and information. Discussion about the use of images are also present.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * This article is apart of two WikiProjects. The first is LGBT Studies, where it has been rated as start-class.  The second is Sexology and sexuality, where it has been rated start-class and high-importance.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * This topic has not been discussed in class.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * This seems to be almost complete and well done.
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * The article clearly lays out how the scale works and how it was used.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * More could be included about research today that have developed from this scale.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * I would assess this as well-developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: