User:Mbrighton3/1980 Damascus Titan missile explosion/Greengiraffe123 Peer Review

This article looks good and has a lot of good information. It doesnt state any opinions or have any biased points of view so that is good as it is a part of the guidelines. There are so many sources used and included as well that have lots of good information in them. I like how it is broken down into sections of leading up to the explosion, what the explosion was and the after math. I think you should include the effect that this explosion had and why we should care about it or like takeaways from this explosion and how to avoid this in the future. You should add a picture of the explosion too so readers can get a visual of the explosion- there are some cool pictures on Google. There are a couple grammar and punctuation errors but other than that this article is great! Also it seems like there might be a part at the end where you were in the process of typing

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)