User:Mbuchi/sandbox

= GICANDI = The gicandi is an oblong gourd played with hands from the Agikuyu community. Its outside is engraved with hieroglyphic symbols and adorned with cowrie shells (ngugutu) some of which are fixed to the gourd itself. According to the Agikuyu, the playing of the gicandi is known as ‘gucanda’ which means to ‘dance’ and the performer is referred to as ‘muini wa gicandi’.

The gicandi comprises a gourd that is filled with seeds known as ‘mwethia’ to form a rattle, and its mouth is secured with adhesive gum. The size of the gourd determines the size of the gicandi. The gicandi is also referred to as ‘mwana’ which translates to a child’ because it is ‘something that has been created’. It is as if it has been born and named a child and the performer was said to be ‘soothing the child’. Similarly, the gicandi is a genre created by artists but, like the child, it belongs to the community. It does not belong to the artists exclusively and neither does it serve them alone. The instrument (the "child") is put in a special bag (referred to as gataki) and then placed in the courtyard where everyone can see it; it acts as a beacon to visitors. The mere presence of the gicandi instrument in the courtyard is an acknowledgement of gicandi as a shared genre and, like the child who belongs to the community, it too belongs to the community.

There are no restrictions on who plays the gicandi – it could be men, women, young boys and girls. However, it is much more common to see it being performed by men. The gicandi is mostly performed as a solo instrument but can also be incorporated with other instruments like the ‘kigamba’.

Construction
The gourd, mbuthu, was carved from a single log of hardwood. The most common hardwood species used is referred to as rungu. After carving it, the gourd’s outer surface is smoothened by using sandpaper. The top of the gourd is then cut to allow access to the hollow inside. The inner surface is also smoothened out in a process known as ‘kueya’ to remove any waste material or seeds from the rungu tree. Failure to do so would not lead to the desired sound associated with the gicandi. The heaviness of the gourd is an important factor for the sound and projection of the gicandi. The lighter the gourd, the better the sound and projection of the gicandi. Drying the gourd in the sun is optional.

After smoothening, the gourd is then marked by the use of a sharp object. This is similar to the hieroglyphic markings of ancient Egypt. The engravings function as a mnemonic of the major themes in a gicandi performance. In other words, writing the pictograms is an act of fixing the text. As representations of major themes, the pictograms are codifications of what is already known about the gicandi genre from prior performances. As a result, they are representations of the orally reactivated performances. The effect of this codification is to retain a generally authoritative text. This act of engraving is referred to as ‘kuara’ (spreading) and was often done by the riverside.

In general, the engravings may not make sense to an outsider because they are not meant to be carriers of information to be transmitted to the general public. Rather, the text on the gicandi gourd acts as an embodiment of the authority of the inscribed text. It is an attempt at regularizing performances and contributing to a gicandi canon formation which would exert power, however limited, over future performances. The fixing of the text is also a preservation of crucial aspects of the oral texts so that reading the gourd, as gicandi performers do, is a recognition and re-activation of ideas previously expressed in preceding performances. To perform gicandi is both to create and to re-accentuate prior texts and this is a dialogic process (Bakhtin 1981).

The illustration alongside shows a diagram depicting markings on a gicandi: After marking, the gourd is then pierced by a sharp object to make multiple holes on the surface. These holes are then filled with thorns known as ‘mithuuthi’. These thorns serve the purpose of making sure the seeds inside the gourd encounter obstructions as the gourd is swayed from side to side. This is essential in ensuring the sound quality of the gourd because if there were no thorns inside the gourd, the seeds would move from one end to the other end freely hence compromising the desired sound.

Then, seeds from the ‘Giethia’ tree are inserted. These seeds are referred to as ‘mwethia’. The Giethia tree is of great significance and reverence among the Agikuyu. This can be seen in the saying ‘Murimi ukurima iguini, wona mwethia ndugakure’ which translates to ‘For the farmer tilling the land if you spot a mwethia tree do not uproot it’.

The gourd is then decorated with cowrie shells known as ngugutu. These shells serve a dual purpose – they decorate and make the gicandi visually appealing whilst also embellishing the sound produced by the mwethia, giving the gicandi a unique sound. The placement of the cowrie shells is used to symbolise society. The topmost cowrie shell usually symbolizes life and its grandeur along with the society at large. Then the cowrie shells are mixed up symbolizing how in society people are different in terms of physical appearance, status quo, economic power and age. It also shows that society is made up of individuals who collectively make up a people, and a culture, in the same way that the cowrie shells all make a unified sound when the gicandi is played.

The gourd is then sealed with a cap known as munyori ugwenga that prevents the mwethia seeds from falling out as the gicandi is played.

Playing technique
The gicandi is played by hand. It is swayed from side to side as the song dictates. Swaying the gicandi vertically and horizontally results in a different sound. Skillful performers usually know when to use vertical and horizontal movements to indicate the beginning and endings of phrases.

Role in Oral Tradition
Oral tradition is a means of receiving, preserving and transmitting knowledge, art, ideas and cultural material from one generation to another. This is especially true among the Agikuyu and the performers of the gicandi were instrumental in this aspect.

Performance of the gicandi would happen at any time. It was used to educate, enlighten and correct individuals. Any social gathering at home or the market was great for performing the gicandi.

The performer had the liberty to perform already existing pieces and to improvise to his liking. He could change the text to suit the appropriate audience sometimes by using codes to convey hidden meanings.

Training
Gicandi performers consider themselves (and are considered by the Agikuyu people) as professionals because they have unique skills utilized in a distinct art form. In addition, they have their register characterised by the use of archaisms and coded messages.

This professionalism and literariness results from the fact that the training of gicandi performers was, at least in the past, an institutionalized phenomenon. There was a physical detachment of apprentices from their homes so that they could be trained by a njoorua, a master poet.

The training would typically last around two months. If a student demonstrated great aptitude for the instrument, he would be declared as ‘muini wa gicandi’. It was only after this training that they could feel confident to perform in public settings. Performers would show their indebtedness and acknowledgement of their tutor's knowledge by making reference to them in performances.

However, if the student was experiencing difficulty, the master would take away the student’s gicandi and halt the lessons. He would then instruct the student to make another gicandi if he wanted to continue with the lessons. This was a test of the student’s determination and will to learn.

Gicandi as a genre
The term gicandi refers both to the dialogue poetry and to the musical instrument that accompanies the performer.

As a genre, gicandi is essentially a competitive, yet cooperative, riddle-like dialogue, poem and poetic exchange between two poets or more. This dialogue poetry seems to epitomise, simultaneously, cooperative competitiveness, a test of wits, problem-posing, and problem-solving.

In gicandi performances, performers are engaged in dialogue with other competing and cooperating performers, each performer addressing the other directly. The performer does not, however, limit himself or herself only to engaging the other performer. Sometimes he or she breaks out of that relation and engages the broader audience in a direct address or commentary.

The performers compete with each other in front of, often large, audiences. One performer would propose an enigma and the other would explain it and propose the next in turn; competition would continue until one of them failed to give the interpretation and so lost the game. The losing party would surrender his instrument to the winner.