User:Mburger77/Spondylolisthesis/Ecw2020 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Mburger77)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spondylolisthesis&oldid=925420620

This article flows well and is broken down in a thoughtful process. There do not seem to be a lot of issues but minor things that may or may not need correction. A few areas of doctor jargon can be cleaned up to be more easily understood but there is very little of it. The links were checked and a few noted that possible either need to be updated or corrected. As this is a work in progress the notability still needs to be worked on and citations need to be added that are more current with systematic and meta analysis but the current added content is good. Some examples of things that may need adjustment.

Opening paragraph: The first sentence could use a source beyond dictionaries and possibly simplify terminology, such as anteriorly translating.

Types: I am unclear on the use of Radiopaedia while an excellent source I do not know if they follow the Wikipedia standards, in any case the citation is to be used it needs to be corrected.

By causes: Possibly put the types in order (1,2,3…) isthmic, pathologic and post-surgical needs citations unless arranged from most common to least common, if so then just state that.

By location: the subtypes is linked to a website of orthobullets and should have a proper source.

Signs and symptoms: Webmd source? Palpation maybe described as examination with the hands.

Maneuvers: This could be an excellent place for pictures showing what the maneuvers are.

Treatment: sourced to a chiropractic journal which may or may not raise eyebrows as controversial.

Conservative: Physical therapy can evaluate and address postural and compensatory movement abnormalities sourced to a website for board review orthoconsult

Retrolisthesis needs citations and History links to Medscape.

The images are well placed and labeled with a clear description making it easier to understand, although at the bottom for surgical and retrohistlesis could be moved up to be more inline with the comments.