User:Mckewill/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Crimson Tide (film)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I wanted to write about a film I had not seen before, and evaluate whether it could explain the plot to me well enough to the point where I could understand it without having seen it.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is very strong, summarizing in three short paragraphs the director, producers, genre, year of release, plot, and composer. If someone wanted a brief introduction or summary of Crimson Tide, they could receive it by reading the lead section. The content is on the lighter side but still very thorough. The author does a good job at keeping a neutral tone, in that he doesn't side with either of the two viewpoints given by the two main characters in the film. There is at least one source per paragraph consistently throughout the article, although there are two actors who are uncredited or simply don't have Wikipedia pages. I thought overall this was an excellent article. I could explain the plot of the film to anyone who asked just based on reading this article. Two things I thought it could improve were its volume of images, as it only has one (the poster), and the section where it listed its award nominations. It stated that it was nominated for three awards but lost all three, and that it lost to Apollo 13 and Braveheart. However, it didn't say which film won which award instead, and I would've added an extra sentence to specify.