User:Mcking24/Kemp's ridley sea turtle/ABuescher Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mcking24 "Kemp's ridley seaturtle


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mcking24/Kemp%27s_ridley_sea_turtle?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Kemp's ridley sea turtle

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I want to see more citations in the Conservation section. It's well written and includes a LOT of facts that need to be better cited. Even if it's the same source there should be a minimum of two cites per paragraph.

"The turtles are popular in Mexico, as raw material for leather and as food." this sentences feels out of place. Like it was supposed to be in an entirely separate section.

second last paragraph in Conservation you have "in to" instead of "into"

"pelagic" now theres a four dollar word

Ok so should it be capitalized differently? Something makes me want it to be capitalized as Kemp's Ridley Seaturtle or Kemp's Ridley seaturtle. Idk it feels weird to me to only capitalize Kemp's

I really like the additions and edits. the original article has a good amount of pictures and sidebars. I think your additions will really take this article and finalize it.

possible extra citation: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/kemps-ridley-turtle

honestly there are so many cites I really don't think you NEED more but i'm supposed to give you one. It might even be a source in there already