User:Mcoope17/1138 Aleppo earthquake/Raomes Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mcoope17


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mcoope17/1138_Aleppo_earthquake?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

This article was very organized. They were able to make clear sections with very different topics about their given earthquake. They were also able to provide adequate information regarding their topic. In the economic and political section, my only comment for this section would be to get rid of the bullet points since none of the other sections are using bullets. In the accuracy and record keeping section, it was a very well written section with good information that was able to dive further into the topic of record keeping. The article evaluation was also well written and was able to provide a successful evaluation of their given earthquake. One critical thing that they were able to notice in their article evaluation was that the original article did not have that much information. overall this was a very well written, successful article. They were able to provide well organized sections and provide relevant information regarding the topic they chose as well.