User:Mcstudent597/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Ngangom Bala Devi
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. : I chose this article to evaluate because I find the topic of women in football interesting. This person also did not have a lot of information on her page.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, This lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic. The lead states who the article is about and what her career is based on.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, the lead is short but it does include a brief description of the article's major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, all of the information in the lead is stated elsewhere in the article as well.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is extremely concise and not over detailed.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes the article is relevant to the topic. All of the information was about the career of Ngangom Bala Devi and her career.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes, the contest is up to date. There were a lot of edits made in 2019.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I do not believe there is content that is missing or that does not belong.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes, the article is neutral. It is all factual.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? there is one claim that seems like it may be biased towards the skill of Bala Devi, The claim states that she "started the tournament in fantastic form".
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, there are no viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, this article does not attempt to persuade the reader in any way.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, all facts are backed up by reliable sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, the sources are thorough.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, all of the sources are from within the last 5-6 years.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, the link I checked work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the article is well written. Everything can be easily understood and read.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, the article does not have any errors that I picked up on.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, since there are only really two major topics, the article is well organized.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, the article does not include any images.
 * Are images well-captioned? No images
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No images
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No images

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There does not seem to be much conversation goin on on the talk page.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths? Over all, the article length is extremely short in comparison to others.
 * How can the article be improved? the article could use more information about her personal life rathe than just her career. There should also be some images as well.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? I think that the article needs more information as well as images so readers know more about who the article is based on.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: