User:Mcwright1981/Empty World/Fabiolabaeza465 Peer Review

Peer Review
Guiding questions:

•           Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, there is a slight change in the lead.

•           Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, there is a concise introduction to the article’s topic.

•           Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, there is article section with an info box.

•           Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.

•           Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes, it's concise

Content

Guiding questions:

•           Is the content added relevant to the topic? Somewhat.

•           Is the content added up-to-date? Somewhat.

•           Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

•           Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No to both questions.

Tone and Balance

•           Is the content added neutral? Yes.

•           Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.

•           Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Neither, it's mostly neutral.

•           Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Guiding questions:

•           Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.

•           Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) Yes.

•           Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.

•           Are the sources current? Yes.

•           Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? No to both.

•           Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)

•           Check a few links. Do they work? There's only one, it works.

Organization

Guiding questions:

•           Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It could use some brushing up.

•           Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

•           Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The picture added is visually pleasing.

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

•           Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, 2 in total.

•           Are images well-captioned?

•           Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes

•           Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes.

•           How can the content added be improved? Yes, it can use more articles and sources.