User:Mdfriday/Evaluate an Article

Typing to begin the process of starting my page.

I am evaluating the Wiki page "Message"

1.    Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

- Yes everything in the article is relevant to the topic of "message", there was nothing present in this article that acted as a form of noise that caused a distraction.

2. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

-'''Checking the references, everything is up to date and cited all within the year of 2019. The "message" page hits on everything about the topic itself and is a good length and doesn't over inform you. Towards the bottom of the page, there is a "See Also" section that further breaks down smaller components of message like, "Airmail, Beacon, Email" etc.'''

3. What else could be improved?

-'''The "In Computer Science" section could be toned down a little bit. Although it did not distract me and I found it interesting, I feel like to some users it could be a distraction to them.'''

4. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased towards a particular position?

-The article is neutral.

5. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

-No

6. Do the links work? Support claims?

-Yes the links work and support the claims.

7. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that biased noted?

-'''The links come from places like msnbc and wham. One of the links is in red and says "missing or empty". Under references, it also notes that it needs additional citations for verification.'''

8. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

-I cannot find the conversations going on about this topic.

9. How is the article rated? Is it part of any WikiProjects?

-I do not see a rating on this page.