User:Mdg132/Nderit pottery/Calaclacka Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mdg132


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mdg132/Nderit pottery


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nderit pottery

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
The page does not have a Lead (a brief summary of the contents of the page). The page is too brief as it stands to have any sectional descriptions.

Content
The claim about Saharan pottery could be moved to a different section rather than the first paragraph, since it is not brought up anywhere else.

Tone and Balance
It is neutral.

Sources and References
I think maybe one more article might help with the review it has already gotten...

Organization
Could definitely use better organization. Perhaps stratification of the sites it has been found at within the second paragraph would be useful? If you're able to find any Creative Commons pictures of the pottery you could make an infobox that might help too.

Images and Media
N/A

New Articles
It definitely needs to be more organized. Adding a Lead and spreading out some of the information might be useful in that.

Overall Impressions
Currently, it is a blocky page. With a bit of spreading out and some further organization, I think it will fit the Wikipedia brand a bit better.