User:Mdiaz1/sandbox/School shooting

Evaluating content -There's a warning sign at the top of the page that states it "possibly contains original research" -A lot of the information provided is not cited -All of the information is relevant to the topic -There are a few sources of opinionated ideas and the sources are mostly from news articles that haven't been peer-reviewed or proven to be reliable Evaluating tone -The article has several neutral points but provides other claims and bais from the sources they derived the information from. So it's not necessarily the Wikipedians that are providing their own opinions but they are providing opinions from other sources -There's an over-represented viewpoint that all schools are unsafe Evaluating sources -The links in the citations do work and the sources support the claims in the article -Each fact, however, is not referenced with an appropriate reliable reference. Most are from surveys (referred to as studies in the wiki article) from news articles and not peer-reviewed or published sources -Not all sources were neutral and there are several talk notes asking where the source came from and questioned if that source was reliable Checking the talk page -The talk page just has reasoning behind the edits that were made to the page with no reply or hostile feedback -It's apart of 3 wikiprojects -Wikipedia throws a lot of imformation peice by peice at you while class discussion is more opinion based and provides solutions that Wikipedia does not