User:Mdiev1000149992/Evaluate an Article

wiki projects on actors and film makers specifically Andjar Asmara
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link)Andjar Asmara
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. i choose this article because i am interested in the arts and film culture

Lead

 * Guiding questions

the article includes a good topic sentence that is concise and clear, with dates, and roles of said person. The page also includes a contents that map out a brief description of the articles topics and themes. i do not know much about Andjar Asmara so therefore i do not know what is excluded from his personal history however the article does cover his early life, career, legacy, role in filmography. the article is concise and short.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions

the content is very relevant to the topic. the content seems up to date as far as i know.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions

the article is neutral and focuses on Andjar's life specifically. his legacy could worked on further and his role as one of the first native Indonesian film directors. the article does not pursued in anyway.


 * Is the article neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

All sources are listed and given, some being from university sources and archives, all from a variety of dates. there are many sources listed from a variety of authors.


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions

the article is well written and laid out in a manner that is logical. it was easy to read. i didn't notice any grammar errors.


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

the images do enhance the article and provide relevancy to topic, the pictures are captioned accordingly.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: