User:Med20a/Social cognitive theory/Ggreenley Peer Review

After reviewing the article, I found the history portion to be informative. The studies mentioned were relevant and communicated in a neutral manner. I would suggest added another experiment, finding, or past examples to add more historical context. I also noticed there was not a lead, but once it is added it will create a better understanding of the relevance/importance of your topic.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)