User:Medains/Sandbox/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of the Martial arts WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's martial arts articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the WP:1.0 program,

The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the Martialartsproject project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Martial arts articles by quality, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

For more information on assessment, see the general assessment FAQ.

Assessment instructions
An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the Martialartsproject project banner on its talk page:



The following values may be used:


 * FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class martial arts articles; should only be used for articles that are currently listed as featured articles)
 * A (adds articles to Category:A-Class martial arts articles; should only be used for articles that have made considerable progress upon the GA version, an article that is undergoing FA review would be A-class)
 * GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class martial arts articles; should only be used for articles that are currently listed as good articles)
 * B (adds articles to Category:B-Class martial arts articles)
 * Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class martial arts articles)
 * Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class martial arts articles)
 * NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:Non-article martial arts pages)

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed martial arts articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Requests for assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


 * 1) Add new items here