User:Media archaeology/sandbox

'Prematerial narrative in the works of Fellini'
text generated from the postmodernism generator located here pomo generator

1. Fellini and capitalist postdialectic theory
In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the concept of capitalist language. Bataille promotes the use of objectivism to attack hierarchy. However, if prepatriarchial Marxism holds, we have to choose between prematerial narrative and Sontagist camp.

“Consciousness is part of the economy of sexuality,” says Debord; however, according to Bailey, Y. C. ed. , it is not so much consciousness that is part of the economy of sexuality, but rather the stasis, and some would say the fatal flaw, of consciousness. The primary theme of Wilson’s analysis of objectivism is a cultural paradox. Therefore, the within/without distinction intrinsic to Smith’s Dogma is also evident in Clerks, although in a more self-referential sense.

In the works of Smith, a predominant concept is the distinction between opening and closing. The subject is contextualised into a capitalist postdialectic theory that includes reality as a reality. In a sense, the premise of objectivism suggests that narrativity may be used to marginalize the Other, but only if prematerial narrative is invalid; otherwise, Baudrillard’s model of capitalist postdialectic theory is one of “the neotextual paradigm of reality”, and therefore used in the service of outdated, sexist perceptions of class.

Many desituationisms concerning not narrative, but prenarrative may be discovered. Thus, Derrida suggests the use of Sontagist camp to analyse and modify sexuality.

Bailey[3] implies that the works of Smith are reminiscent of Koons. But any number of discourses concerning objectivism exist.

If capitalist postdialectic theory holds, we have to choose between objectivism and the textual paradigm of expression. Therefore, a number of theories concerning the common ground between sexual identity and class may be revealed.

The premise of capitalist postdialectic theory holds that narrative comes from communication. In a sense, any number of constructions concerning objectivism exist.

2. Prematerial narrative and neocultural nihilism
“Truth is intrinsically dead,” says Derrida; however, according to Prinn[4], it is not so much truth that is intrinsically dead, but rather the dialectic, and thus the genre, of truth. Sontag uses the term ‘predialectic cultural theory’ to denote the role of the writer as poet. Therefore, the absurdity of objectivism depicted in Smith’s Mallrats emerges again in Clerks.

If one examines neocultural nihilism, one is faced with a choice: either accept objectivism or conclude that the purpose of the artist is significant form. Neocultural nihilism suggests that discourse is a product of the masses. Thus, Marx uses the term ‘objectivism’ to denote not narrative as such, but postnarrative.

Finnis[5] states that the works of Smith are postmodern. In a sense, Sartre uses the term ‘neocultural nihilism’ to denote a neosemanticist totality.

Derrida promotes the use of Batailleist `powerful communication’ to deconstruct the status quo. Thus, the characteristic theme of the works of Stone is the bridge between society and sexual identity.

Marx’s essay on prematerial narrative suggests that the significance of the participant is social comment, but only if narrativity is interchangeable with art. Therefore, Lacan uses the term ‘cultural theory’ to denote not, in fact, discourse, but subdiscourse.

If neocultural nihilism holds, we have to choose between Derridaist reading and neodeconstructive narrative. However, Lacan uses the term ‘objectivism’ to denote a mythopoetical reality.

3. Contexts of defining characteristic
The primary theme of d’Erlette’s[6] analysis of neocultural nihilism is not dematerialism, but predematerialism. Many discourses concerning the collapse, and subsequent fatal flaw, of subdialectic society may be discovered. But Debord uses the term ‘objectivism’ to denote the role of the poet as observer.

“Sexuality is elitist,” says Marx. An abundance of theories concerning textual postmodern theory exist. Therefore, Sartre suggests the use of neocultural nihilism to attack society.

The characteristic theme of the works of Stone is the meaninglessness, and eventually the failure, of textual class. The primary theme of Wilson’s[7] model of prematerial narrative is not discourse, but postdiscourse. However, objectivism holds that academe is part of the fatal flaw of consciousness.

Lyotard promotes the use of cultural deappropriation to challenge capitalism. It could be said that Drucker[8] suggests that we have to choose between prematerial narrative and postpatriarchialist discourse.

The subject is interpolated into a neocultural nihilism that includes truth as a totality. Therefore, Marx’s critique of Debordist image states that the purpose of the artist is significant form, given that prematerial narrative is valid.

If objectivism holds, we have to choose between the dialectic paradigm of expression and neotextual theory. But the premise of neocultural nihilism suggests that sexuality is used to reinforce class divisions.

Many constructions concerning the economy, and some would say the genre, of cultural narrativity may be found. Thus, Foucault suggests the use of predialectic capitalism to read and analyse society.

3. Bailey, V. R. ed. (1976) Deconstructing Foucault: Objectivism and prematerial narrative. Oxford University Press

4. Prinn, J. Y. U. (1989) The material paradigm of reality, feminism and objectivism. Panic Button Books

5. Finnis, Z. ed. (1995) The Genre of Narrative: Objectivism in the works of Stone. University of Georgia Press

6. d’Erlette, P. N. (1974) Prematerial narrative and objectivism. Cambridge University Press

7. Wilson, M. ed. (1983) Realities of Dialectic: Objectivism and prematerial narrative. University of Michigan Press

8. Drucker, F. Z. (1991) Prematerial narrative and objectivism. O’Reilly & Associates