User:Meekhof7/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Bruce Harrell

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because He was someone I hadn't heard of before and thought it would be interesting to learn about him.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

Yes, the article has a strong and concise first sentence describing who Bruce Harrel is. Mainly just the political side, then it got into a more in-depth introduction and description of his life later on in the article.

No the lead does not.

Yes the lead is concise and to the point.

Content

Yes it is.

Yes. The content of the page was last updated in 2022.

All of the context of the article was in place and there was nothing I believed shouldn't have been added in the article.

Yes, it talked about how he was the first black mayor since Norm Rice and the first Asian major in the United States.

Tone and Balance

Yes, the article is natural and gives an unbiased explanation of who Bruce Harrel was.

No.

No.

No.

No.

Sources and References

There was a total of 27 different sources referenced, which is very strong for such a short explanation in an article.

There were references raged from up to date sources to some that were from 2011 and 2014. Most of those 27 were fairly recent articles from the past few years or so.

Yes the links did work when I tried a few of them.

Organization and writing quality

I copied and pasted the article into Grammarly and found no grammar or punctuation issues throughout the entire article.

The article is very well written and has a very clear and to the point flow throughout.

Images and Media

Yes the images are all cited and are very relevant to the article.

Talk page discussions

There are some discussions on the talk page about some of the sources that are mis cited and such.

Overall impressions

I thought that this article was very well put together, had a lot of credible and reliable sources to back up the explanation and information that was provided.

I don't see many weaknesses in this article at all.

It was a very well developed article and flowed very well. It was also short and to the point, it didn't drag it out at all and lose your attention.