User:MeganWilliams33/Calorie restriction/AdamTski Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? MeganWilliams33
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:MeganWilliams33/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes but it is cited
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It has a lot of quotes but the info pertains

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, it is a big step up from the one sentence in the article
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, past 10 years recent
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, every claim has a source
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No, it deals with diet

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, a lot of the claims are sourced from scientific research
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No the topic is thorough enough
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, a lot of the info is just scientific research

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes they are relevant to the topic
 * Are the sources current? Yes, they are within the last 10 years
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? To an extent; it's basically three different sources
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, the links work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the grammar could be improved a little
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not anything huge but a lot of the words could be switched around to sound more fluid.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes- granted there are only two subjects.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, a lot more info on the particular topic
 * What are the strengths of the content added? More information, and context around the article.
 * How can the content added be improved? Switch some of the words in order to make it more fluid.