User:Meganboddy/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:Justice League

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I think the topic is interesting and I watched a lot of justice league when I was little.

Evaluate the article
The leading paragraph makes it very clear we are talking about the justice league as a whole and even goes into explaining who they are in case you were new to this information. The lead paragraph doesn't do a great job by telling you what they will be talking about. They mention they will be talking about how the justice league is now present in many other platforms but that is only a small portion of the entire article. The lead doesn't present any information not mentioned later and uses the right amount of detail.

All of the content is relevant to the topic and a wide variety of aspects. Most of the information written about in this article revolves around the creation or the beginning of the justice league there are mentions of more recent activity but most of it revolves before 2010. I don't think there is any information that should be taken or added. This topic doesn't fit in historically underrepresented populations or topics.

While reading this article I didn't see any cases of biased opinions or biased claims. I think everything was spread out pretty well and each subcategory had an equal amount of attention. There is no attempt of persuasion throughout this whole thing.

Not all of the facts are backed up by multiple sources but the sources that are used are a very big variety with a wide source of information. There are some sources that could be better but because of the variety I think their sources are still good choices. The link do work.

The article for the most part is very clear there are a few points in which you can get a little lost. I saw no grammatical or spelling errors. I think the writer did a very good job organizing the information and making sure information that went together stayed together.

There are only two images in this article and personally I would add more to help enhance the writing. The images are well captioned and do fit the copyright regulations. The images are laid out in a good way but again i would add a few more.

The conversation going on is an argument between two people fighting over how the article should be written and why each other is doing it wrong. This article is in 4 different wiki projects.

I think the article was a pretty good article overall and only had a few things that needed to be changed. Strengths include the amount of information to back up all of their topics and even the sources they used. I think something that needs to be improved upon in a little more detail about newer information and a few more photos. This article is a well developed article.