User:Megatron888/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_law_of_the_United_States

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?

(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

This article was chosen due to it being the topic our group is going to work on for the project and I wanted to evaluate this article since we will be spending alot of time on it.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section could use some work, there is information there but it is not very strong. The reader could get a brief idea of what they are about to read but definitely needs improvement.

The content is fairly detailed but is also lacking in deeper interpretations and understandings. The content does not feel organized or purposeful. The content also is not all from reliable sourcing and does not seem to carry a specific pace.

The tone and balance appear to be unbiased but the article also seems to focus very heavily on certain aspects of the law. It feels as if a lot is left out of the article.

The sourcing feels to fall short, there does not seem to be very much secondary sourcing or reliable peer reviewed information.

There is no media or images would could use improving.

The talk page does not appear to have any conversations started yet.

The article is definitely heading in the right direction and has strong points about law, but the article needs alot more review and detailed information. The article could also use media and imagery.