User:Megfennelly/Orb-weaver spider/C.bellavance20 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Meg Fennelly


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Megfennelly/Orb-weaver_spider?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Orb-weaver spider
 * Orb-weaver spider

Evaluate the drafted changes
Checklist:

-everything in article is relevant. There was already quite a lot of information to it, and it seems like you added to the overall description.

-Something that is a bit overwhelming regarding the syntax of the article is the description portion. It is very long, and seems like it could be split into multiple sections that are more specific, like "ecology", "habitats", "behavior/morphology", etc. That could be something you work on!

- The article is neutral.

- it doesn't seem as though any viewpoints are overrepresented/ underrepresented, however the description section seems heavy in comparison to the rest. Lots of cool pictures which can be helpful.

-The references section of your draft is a little confusing because there is a bullet point of a citation right above the exact same citation. I'm also not really sure why you cited/quoted the article that you're editing.

-This may just be because of the fact that it's not actually published yet, but I can't access the references/links that are in your sandbox, so I looked up the first one which seems credible. The second source didn't seem to have a title or anything useful so I didn't review that one, sorry!